Text Sources
Q1 – UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) – Boosting infrastructure in developing countries: Foreign investment helps -- if planning is effective
https://unctad.org/press-material/boosting-infrastructure-developing-countries-foreign-investment-helps-if-planning
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt, dass FDI zur Finanzierung des Infrastrukturbedarfs von Entwicklungsländern beitragen kann.
π "Meeting the huge needs of developing countries for infrastructure such as roads, ports, and electricity supply is a major challenge and requires better use of private-sector resources, including those of transnational corporations (TNCs)"
Q2 – The World Bank Economic Review – Infrastructure Quality and FDI Inflows: Evidence from the Arrival of High-Speed Internet in Africa
https://academic.oup.com/wber/article/38/1/1/7240369
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt den Zusammenhang zwischen Infrastrukturqualität und FDI-Zuflüssen.
π "Does ambient infrastructural quality affect foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries?"
Q3 – UNCTAD – Global Investment Trends Monitor January 2025
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaeiainf2025d1_en.pdf
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt das Interesse privater und institutioneller Investoren an Infrastruktur und digitaler Konnektivität in Schwellenländern.
π "Private equity firms are expected to drive FDI in emerging markets and growth sectors. Institutional investors [...] are showing an increased appetite for long-term, inflation-resistant assets such as infrastructure and digital connectivity projects."
Q4 – OECD – Measuring Foreign Direct Investment in Regions
https://www.oecd.org/en/about/projects/measuring-foreign-direct-investment-in-regions.html
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt die räumliche Verteilung von FDI und Unterschiede zwischen Greenfield- und Brownfield-Investitionen.
π "The percentage is higher for brownfield investments (56%) than for greenfield (29%)."
Q5 – Frontiers of Business Research in China – Does distance matter in FDI sub-national location choice? Evidence from China
https://fbr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s11782-020-00080-8
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt Verkehr, Kommunikation und natürliche Ressourcen als Standortfaktoren für FDI.
π "transportation and communications in the eastern region are well-developed, while the middle and western regions have the advantage of being well-endowed with natural resources."
Q6 – The potential of foreign direct investment (FDI) as a means of developing ports: Evidence from Oman
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337786005_The_potential_of_foreign_direct_investment_FDI_as_a_means_of_developing_ports_Evidence_from_Oman
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt mögliche positive Auswirkungen von FDI auf Kapitalzugang, Management, Beschäftigung und Hafenentwicklung.
π "The benefits of FDI to Omani ports include providing access to capital, bringing new organizational and managerial practices, creating more jobs, supplementing domestic investment"
Q7 – IMF – Chapter 4: Geoeconomic Fragmentation and Foreign Direct Investment
https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9798400224119/CH004.xml
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt, dass geopolitische Spannungen und geoökonomische Fragmentierung die Geographie von FDI verändern können.
π "Supply-chain disruptions and rising geopolitical tensions have brought the risks and potential benefits and costs of geoeconomic fragmentation to the center of the policy debate. This chapter studies how such fragmentation can reshape the geography of foreign direct investment (FDI)"
Q8 – World Bank – Political Risk and Policy Responses: Retention and Expansion of Foreign Investment
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/387801576142339003/pdf/Political-Risk-and-Policy-Responses.pdf
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt das Risiko von Rückzug oder Stornierung ausländischer Investitionen infolge politischer Risiken.
π "FDI at risk of withdrawal or cancellation"
Q9 – ScienceDirect – Climate change vulnerability-foreign direct investment linkage: Why climate change preparedness matters in Sub-Saharan Africa
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090944324000012
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt Klimarisiken als Faktor bei FDI-Standortentscheidungen.
π "the sensitivity of Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows to the level of a region’s vulnerability to climate risks somewhat substantiates the argument that return potentials fundamentally determine FDI location decisions"
Q10 – UNCTAD – World Investment Report 2019: Special Economic Zones
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2019_overview_en.pdf
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt mögliche Beschäftigungs- und Entwicklungswirkungen von Sonderwirtschaftszonen, weist aber darauf hin, dass diese nicht automatisch entstehen.
π "Zones are often an effective tool for job creation, particularly for women. However, none of the potential economic contributions of SEZs are automatic."
Q11 – World Economic Forum – How a Special Economic Zone can propel economic development
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/02/special-economic-zones-how-one-city-helped-propel-its-country-s-economic-development/
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt die Rolle von Risikominderung und Infrastruktur in Sonderwirtschaftszonen bei der Anziehung von FDI.
π "SEZs are a great vehicle for international trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) to drive economic development. They reassure investors and those exploring business in a particular jurisdiction that the mitigation of risk can be reduced or eliminated in a market. From the proper infrastructure (i.e. seaports and airports) to legal exemptions provided by the host country or alignment with Western models, SEZs have been used as a bridge to encourage and accelerate the development of trade and Investment."
Q12 – UNCTAD – ASEAN Investment Report 2017: Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Zones in ASEAN
https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/unctad_asean_air2017d1.pdf
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt die Einbindung von ASEAN in globale FDI-Ströme.
π "The fall in EU FDI flows in ASEAN mirrored the decline in global FDI in 2002."
Q13 – UNCTAD – World Investment Report 2025: International investment in the digital economy
https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2025
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt die geographische Umstrukturierung internationaler Lieferketten.
π "multinationals are restructuring supply chains towards South-East Asia, Eastern Europe and Central America – a shift that began during the pandemic and is accelerating. FDI to developed economies fell by 22%."
Q14 – BCG – Acting Decisively as Global Sourcing Shifts
https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/acting-decisively-global-sourcing-shifts
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt, wie Zölle Beschaffungs- und Standortstrategien verändern und Reshoring fördern können.
π "heightened tariffs on critical imports—such as semiconductors, steel, and aluminum—are pushing US companies to reconsider their sourcing strategies, encouraging greater domestic production and reshoring."
Q15 – Supply Chain Nuggets – The Story Behind Apple’s Manufacturing Shift Away From China
https://supplychainnuggets.com/the-story-behind-apples-manufacturing-shift-away-from-china/
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt Lieferkettendiversifizierung zur Verringerung von Risiken und Erhöhung der Resilienz am Beispiel Apple.
π "Apple diversified production from China to India and Vietnam to lower supply risk and improve resilience"
Q16 – Wikipedia – Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigafactory_Berlin-Brandenburg
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt die Nähe zu Verkehrsinfrastruktur als Faktor bei der Standortwahl der Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg.
π "Proximity to Berlin Brandenburg Airport (about 20 km or 12 mi west) was explicitly cited as a factor in choosing the site. It is Tesla's first manufacturing location in Europe."
Q17 – Wikipedia – Belt and Road Initiative
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt die internationale Infrastrukturorientierung der Belt and Road Initiative.
π "Projects in over 150 countries include ports, railways, highways, power stations, aviation, and telecommunications. The initiative [...] aims to invest in over 150 countries and international organizations through six overland economic corridors and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road."
Q18 – Studies of Applied Economics – Chinese FDI for Infrastructure Development in Africa
https://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/eea/article/view/3761
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt einen positiven Zusammenhang zwischen chinesischen Investitionen und Infrastrukturentwicklung in den untersuchten afrikanischen Ländern.
π "The findings of the study reveal that Chinese investment has a positive impact on infrastructure development in the sample countries. Based on study findings, it is safely concluded that Chinese investment and infrastructure development move parallel in the sample countries."
Q19 – World Bank – Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) Annual Report 2024
https://ppi.worldbank.org/content/dam/PPI/documents/PPI_2024_Annual_Report.pdf
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt die Höhe und sektorale Verteilung privater Infrastrukturinvestitionen in Entwicklungs- und Schwellenländern 2023 und 2024.
π "Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) investment in 2024 reached $100.7 billion"
π "This marks a notable increase of 16 percent from $87.1 billion in 2023"
π "Energy led with $67.9 billion across 217 projects"
π "ICT hit a record $10.5 billion, though spread over fewer projects than in 2023"
π "Transport rose to $20.6 billion across 38 projects but remained well below historic peaks"
π "In contrast, water declined to $1.3 billion, continuing its gradual downward trend"
π Sektortabelle: Energy 67.9 / Transport 20.6 / ICT 10.5 / Water 1.3 (US$ Billion, 2024); Energy 63.7 / Transport 13.7 / ICT 7.8 / Water 1.8 (US$ Billion, 2023).
β οΈ Hinweis: Die letzten Werte wurden aus einer Tabelle übernommen und sind daher nicht als zusammenhängende Textstelle per STRG+F auffindbar.
β οΈ Hinweis: Die letzten Werte wurden aus einer Tabelle übernommen und sind daher nicht als zusammenhängende Textstelle per STRG+F auffindbar.
Q21 – UNCTAD – World Investment Report 2025: International investment in the digital economy
https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/publications/1310/world-investment-report-2025-international-investment-in-the-digital-economy
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt den Rückgang globaler FDI sowie die schwache Investitionstätigkeit in für Entwicklung wichtige Sektoren.
π "Global foreign direct investment fell by 11%, marking the second consecutive year of decline and confirming a deepening slowdown in productive capital flows, according to the World Investment Report 2025"
π "In developing countries, inflows appeared broadly stable – but this concealed a deeper crisis: in too many economies, capital is stagnating or bypassing entirely the sectors that matter most – infrastructure, energy, technology, and the industries that drive job creation"
π "Investment dropped sharply across developed economies, particularly in Europe"
Q22 – UNCTAD – World Investment Report 2025 (Publication Page)
https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2025
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt den Rückgang grenzüberschreitender Infrastruktur- und entwicklungsrelevanter Investitionen in Entwicklungsländern.
π "Investment flows to developing countries for infrastructure fell 35%, renewable energy 31%, water and sanitation 30% and agrifood systems 19%"
π "International project finance – a key source of funding for infrastructure – dropped 26%, continuing a multi-year slump"
π "total volumes remained small – under $15 billion"
Q23 – UNCTAD – World Investment Report 2026: International investment in a turbulent era (PDF)
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2026_en.pdf
Last accessed: 21.08.2026
→ Belegt die aktuellsten globalen FDI-Trends 2025, Veränderungen der Investitionsmotive, geopolitische und wirtschaftsgeographische Standortfaktoren sowie sektorale Verschiebungen der internationalen Investitionen.
Q23a – Globale FDI-Trends 2025
π "Global foreign direct investment (FDI) showed resilience in 2025. Flows rose by 6 per cent to $1.6 trillion, despite geopolitical tensions, trade policy uncertainty and high financing costs. (S. 5)"
π "Excluding conduit flows through major European financial centres, global FDI increased 4 per cent after two consecutive years of decline. The outlook for 2026 is affected by significant downside risks owing to trade policy uncertainty, geopolitical tensions and conflicts."
π "However, growth remains fragile and uneven. Inflows increased by 11 per cent in developed economies, compared with 2 per cent in developing economies, and the outlook remains clouded by trade policy uncertainty and geopolitical tensions. (S. iv)"
π "flows to developing economies increased by 2 per cent to just above $901 billion, but stood 23 per cent above their 15-year average. (S. 6)"
π "Investment expansion was driven largely by a small number of megaprojects, particularly infrastructure related to artificial intelligence. (S. iii)"
π "FDI remains a critical source of external finance for developing economies (figure I.3). In 2025, it accounted for about 50 per cent of their total external financing, making it the largest source – ahead of remittances, official development assistance and portfolio flows. (S. 8)"
π "Yet, regardless of its relative importance by income group, FDI plays a distinct role in development because of its links to productive investment, technology transfer and integration into global value chains (GVCs). (S. 8)"
π "Foreign direct investment remains a key driver of development. It brings more than capital into a country: it represents technology transfer, new skills, jobs and access to markets. (S. v)"
Q23b – Strategische Sektoren
π "Over the same period, the share of global greenfield investment in strategic sectors increased from 16 per cent to 44 per cent, indicating a strong shift towards a limited set of priority industries. (S. 117)"
π "AI infrastructure and AI-related technologies are among the fastest-growing components of strategic sector investment. Between 2020 and 2025, announced greenfield investment in AI-related activities grew at an average annual rate of 47 per cent (see figure III.1). (S. 117)"
Q23b – Megaprojekte
π "A defining feature of recent investment trends is the growing importance of megaprojects (worth $1 billion or more), which now account for a large share of global investment value. In 2025, megaprojects accounted for about 44 per cent of the total value of announced greenfield investment, up from 22 per cent in 2017, with project numbers more than doubling over the same period (box figure I.7.1). (S. 41)"
π "The scale, capital intensity and strategic nature of megaprojects limit their location to economies with the necessary financial capacity, infrastructure and policy support, reinforcing the dominance of a small set of countries. (S. 42)"
Q23b – Ärmeren Ländern entgehen strategische Investitionen
π "On the recipient side, economies in the low-income and lower-middle-income World Bank groups together attract only about 10 per cent of global greenfield investment in strategic sectors, compared with more than 20 per cent in the other sectors, and the share of low-income countries remains marginal (S. 119)"
π "Participation varies significantly across strategic sectors, remaining very limited in semiconductors, advanced technologies and AI-related activities, but reaching 15 per cent in critical minerals. The latter stands out as the only strategic sector in which low-income countries capture a non-negligible share of global investment, reflecting the importance of location-specific resource endowments. (S. 119)"
Q23b – Wandel der Investitionsmotive
π "For decades, capital followed cost and efficiency, areas in which developing countries were able to compete. Today, investment follows strategic calculation and industrial policy marked by subsidies, economic security and technological advantage. (S. iv)"
π "This logic rewards deep pockets and established ecosystems, and most developing countries cannot match the support that the largest economies now deploy. (S. iv)"
π "The hardest challenges today are attracting investment at all, as the aspects driving investment no longer reward the strengths that developing economies have always brought. (S. iv)"
Q23b – Bedeutung von FDI als externe Finanzierung
π "FDI remains a critical source of external finance for developing economies (figure I.3). In 2025, it accounted for about 50 per cent of their total external financing, making it the largest source – ahead of remittances, official development assistance and portfolio flows. (S. 8)"
π "In least developed countries (LDCs), however, FDI accounts for less than 25 per cent of total external finance and portfolio investment remains negligible. (S. 8)"
Q23b – Digitale und traditionelle Infrastruktur
π "Infrastructure investment in 2025 showed a marked divergence between fast growth in digital infrastructure and weaker activity in other segments (figure I.20). Growth was driven overwhelmingly by digital infrastructure in general but especially data centres, as rapidly growing demand for cloud computing and AI development pushed announced project values in the sector up by more than 80 per cent. (S. 42)"
π "By contrast, projects in renewable energy slowed further, marking a fourth consecutive annual decline in international investment in the sector, although it remains the largest infrastructure segment by value at more than $600 billion in 2025. (S. 43)"
π "Although developing economies have more than tripled their greenfield investment in the digital economy since 2000, their share of total global investment in the digital sector has remained broadly unchanged at just over one third, indicating a slower structural transition towards digital investment compared with developed economies. (S. 42)"
Q23b – Energieinvestitionen
π "Greenfield investment in renewable energy fell by almost 25 per cent and project numbers also declined. (S. 43)"
π "The slowdown extended beyond renewables: investment in power, electricity, and energy and gas supply also declined in 2025, pointing to broader weaknesses across the energy system. (S. 43)"
Q23b – Geopolitische Risiken
π "Within the region, heightened security risks, disruptions to transport and logistics, and rising insurance and operating costs are leading to the suspension, delay or cancellation of many ongoing and planned investment projects. Capital-intensive investment – particularly in infrastructure, energy and industrial activities – is the most exposed. (S. 14)"
π "The conflict is likely to depress global FDI in the near term and contribute to a more selective and uneven recovery, favouring locations with greater macroeconomic stability, lower geopolitical risk and more resilient infrastructure. (S. 14)"
π "The results reflect a highly unsettled investment environment: 76 per cent of respondents identified geopolitical tensions or conflicts among the external factors having the greatest impact on investment in their country over the past three years, while 58 per cent cited the global economic slowdown and 54 per cent cited trade policy uncertainty (S. 111)"
π "Two thirds of agencies reported that geopolitical and trade policy turbulences have been the main factors affecting investment in their country, leading to project cancellations or downsizing in some cases, but also to relocations both into and out of their economies. (S. 110)"
Q23b – Nearshoring und Lieferketten
π "By contrast, geographic proximity does not appear yet to be a main driver of reconfiguration of manufacturing investment. The share of outward investment directed towards geographically closer destinations – including both regional investment and other forms of nearshoring – has not increased systematically across major investor economies (figure III.18). The United States is a notable exception, with increased investment within North America, largely reflecting deeper integration with Canada. (S. 155)"
π "Sixty per cent of respondents reported project downsizing or cancellations in the preceding three years, but many also observed project expansions (55 per cent) and relocations into their country (50 per cent). (S. 153)"
Q23b – Zölle, Subventionen und Investitionsmotive
π "Subsidies and incentives alter investment risk and returns and can attract mobile capital to targeted sectors and locations. Tariffs and localization requirements raise the cost of importing or sourcing abroad, which can encourage market-seeking FDI or supply chain restructuring (section C). However, they may deter efficiency-seeking investment that relies on integrated global value chains. (S. 135)"
Q23b – US-amerikanische Unternehmen
π "United States MNEs have seen domestic assets grow faster than foreign assets. The average foreign share of total assets declined from 43 per cent in 2017–2019 to 39 per cent in 2022–2024, highlighting a shift towards the domestic market (figure I.21). (S. 54)"
π "This shift was most pronounced in infrastructure, oil and gas, and pharmaceuticals. (S. 54)"
Q23b – Chinesische Unternehmen
π "Chinese MNEs saw a slight decline in foreign asset shares, especially in Stateled sectors, while privately owned firms in technology and automotive continued to expand abroad (S. 54)"
π "The contraction was most pronounced in sectors dominated by large State-owned MNEs, including oil and gas, infrastructure and heavy industry. Major players, including COSCO Shipping, defence group Norinco and Shandong Energy, slowed the pace of their foreign investment expansion and refocused on the domestic market. (S. 54)"
π "For example, CATL tripled its share of foreign assets, from less than 10 per cent before the pandemic to almost 30 per cent recently. Huawei also significantly expanded its foreign operations, focusing on cloud computing, 5G infrastructure, green energy solutions and enterprise digital transformation, particularly in developing regions such as Africa and the Middle East. (S. 54)"
Q23b – Ostasiatische Technologieunternehmen
π "MNEs from advanced East Asian economies – Japan, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan Province of China – have increased their internationalization rapidly, particularly in technology and industry (figure I.24). (S. 56)"
π "Among the companies most significantly changing their foreign orientation are Sony (Japan), whose foreign asset ratio increased from about 25 per cent before the pandemic to more than 65 per cent in 2024, and semiconductor producer TSMC (Taiwan Province of China), which began investing abroad at scale only in the past five years but raised its foreign asset ratio from less than 5 per cent to more than 20 per cent by 2024. (S. 56)"
Q23b – Regionale Infrastrukturkorridore
π "Regional transport, energy and logistics corridors are critical foundations for regional investment integration. Beyond facilitating trade, corridors can create investable nodes – including ports, dry ports, logistics hubs, industrial parks, border platforms and specialized zones – that concentrate infrastructure and services in locations capable of attracting investment. (S. 185)"
π "In South-East Asia, corridor-based industrial clustering has supported crossborder production networks linked to major manufacturing hubs. In Africa and other regions with fragmented national markets, emerging border zone initiatives point to the potential role of such spatial platforms in anchoring investment and fostering regional value chains. (S. 185)"
π "The development impact of such initiatives, however, depends on the quality of infrastructure, the depth of policy coordination, the effectiveness of customs and administrative arrangements, and the extent to which enclave investments are linked to domestic and regional supplier networks. Where these conditions are weak, zones and corridors may remain transit spaces or isolated enclaves with limited upgrading effects. (S. 185)"
Q23b – Sektorale Verschiebung 2025
π "Growth in announced greenfield project and IPF deal values in 2025 was concentrated in data centres, oil and gas and semiconductors, while renewable energy, GVC-intensive manufacturing industries and several basic infrastructure sectors weakened. (S. 40)"
π "Infrastructure also declined, raising concerns that the concentration of financing capacity in commercially attractive digital infrastructure and telecommunications assets may be crowding out other forms of infrastructure investment, particularly in capital-constrained project finance markets (CEPR VoxEU, 2026). (S. 40)"
Q23b – SDG-Investitionen
π "The value of announced greenfield projects rose by 11 per cent to $233 billion, while that of IPF deals increased by 26 per cent to $386 billion (table I.9 and table I.10). (S. 46)"
π "In LDCs, greenfield project values rose from $3.5 billion to $14.3 billion and IPF values increased by 164 per cent to $21 billion, with the number of projects also rising. (S. 46)"
π "IPF growth was also concentrated in a few economies. The top 10 recipients accounted for more than half of project numbers and 62 per cent of deal values in 2025, reinforcing the uneven distribution of investment gains across Goals-related sectors and countries. (S. 46)"
Q23b – Konzentration globaler FDI
π "FDI inflows in 2025 remained highly concentrated among a relatively small number of host economies. The top 20 recipients accounted for more than 80 per cent of global FDI inflows. Developing economies represented half of the economies in the top 20 ranking (figure I.4), underscoring their continued importance as destinations for FDI. (S. 9)"
Q23b – FDI-Renditen
π "declining overall rates of return on FDI point to weaker incentives for the broader population of firms (S. 15)"
π "This divergence suggests a growing concentration of international production, with value creation and profitability becoming more narrowly distributed among a small group of dominant players in strategic sectors. (S. 15)"
Q23b – Mexiko und Nearshoring
π "Mexico remained the main beneficiary of nearshoring-related manufacturing FDI, but the decline in announced greenfield values and project numbers in 2025 suggests more cautious investor sentiment, particularly in export-oriented activities exposed to trade policy uncertainty (box I.5). (S. 35)"
Q23b – Klima- und Wetterrisiken
π "Climate-related risks, including extreme weather events and rising sea levels, further affect investment decisions and long-term sustainability. (S. 37)"
π "It also catalyses infrastructure spending such as for airports, ports, energy and urban services, strengthening the broader business environment. For SIDS, this makes tourism investment particularly important, but also highly cyclical and dependent on external demand, air connectivity and investor confidence (World Bank, 2024). (S. 37)"
π Tabelle I.2: Rate of return on inward FDI: 2024: 10.2% → 2025: 7.0%; Rate of return on outward FDI: 2024: 9.7% → 2025: 7.1%. (S. 15)
β οΈ Hinweis: Diese Werte stammen aus Tabelle I.2 und sind daher nicht als zusammenhängendes Direktzitat per STRG+F auffindbar.
Graphic Sources
VG1 – AI-generated image
https://chatgpt.com/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "2 Pfeile die aufeinander zeigen und Horizontal verlaufen, die Pfeile sollen in 2 Farben sein, Links Blau und Rechts ein Orangener Pfeil.
Der Linke Pfeil sollte Arbeit Icons enthalten, wie zb. eine Fabrik, ein Schiff oder Arbeiter.
Der Rechte Pfeil sollte Investitionssachen beinhalten wie zb. ein Computerchip oder ein Windrad mit Solarmodulen daneben.
Im Hintergrund sollte eine Weltkarte dargestellt sein allerdings in einem gräulichen Ton sodass der Fokus auf den beiden Pfeilen beleibt und die Weltkarte nur den Hintergrund ergänzt."
Der Linke Pfeil sollte Arbeit Icons enthalten, wie zb. eine Fabrik, ein Schiff oder Arbeiter.
Der Rechte Pfeil sollte Investitionssachen beinhalten wie zb. ein Computerchip oder ein Windrad mit Solarmodulen daneben.
Im Hintergrund sollte eine Weltkarte dargestellt sein allerdings in einem gräulichen Ton sodass der Fokus auf den beiden Pfeilen beleibt und die Weltkarte nur den Hintergrund ergänzt."
VG2 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Erstelle ein Diagramm mit 3 Elementen Icon 1 soll den Geldfluss, das Kapital darstellen, Icon 2 eine Fabrik und Kontrolle und Einfluss symbolisieren zu guter Letzt sollte das 3. Icon ein Globales Netz sein, welches die Integration in die Wertschöpfungskette visualisiert.
Die 3 Icons sollen in den Typischen NoraStudios Farben dargestellt werden und die gesamte Grafik sollte wieder eine Weltkarte als Hintergrund haben bei der die Länder Grau und das Meer Weiß ist."
Die 3 Icons sollen in den Typischen NoraStudios Farben dargestellt werden und die gesamte Grafik sollte wieder eine Weltkarte als Hintergrund haben bei der die Länder Grau und das Meer Weiß ist."
VG3 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Erstelle mir eine Grafik mit einer Weltkarte mit Grauen Ländern und weißem Hintergrund, verteile über die Weltkarte 5 Icons eine Straße in den USA, eine Fabrik in Asien, ein Hafen in Afrika, einen Menschen in Lateinamerika und eine weitere Fabrik in Australien."
VG4 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Erstelle eine Weltkarte mit zwei Farbverläufen:
Ressourcenreiche Regionen (Afrika, Lateinamerika) → Symbol: Ölbohrturm
Infrastrukturstarke Regionen (Ostchina, EU) → Symbol: Fabrik
(Kein Text, nur visuelle Unterscheidung im Nora-Studios-Farbverlauf)"
Ressourcenreiche Regionen (Afrika, Lateinamerika) → Symbol: Ölbohrturm
Infrastrukturstarke Regionen (Ostchina, EU) → Symbol: Fabrik
(Kein Text, nur visuelle Unterscheidung im Nora-Studios-Farbverlauf)"
VG5 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Erstelle eine Visuelle Zeitachse mit 2 Punkten, Links Cost & Efficiency rechts Strategy & Geopolitics"
VG6 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Balkendiagramm mit drei Säulen (KI, Halbleiter, Rohstoffe) und Wachstumspfeilen
(Keine konkreten Werte, nur visuelle Darstellung der Wachstumstrends im Nora-Studios-Farbverlauf)"
(Keine konkreten Werte, nur visuelle Darstellung der Wachstumstrends im Nora-Studios-Farbverlauf)"
VG7 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Erstelle eine Wage in den Nora-Studiosfarben, auf der linken Waagschale sollen Münzen abgebildet sein, auf der Rechten eine Fabrik.
Es sollte kein Höhenunterschied der Waagschalen existieren, beide sollen gleich hoch sein."
Es sollte kein Höhenunterschied der Waagschalen existieren, beide sollen gleich hoch sein."
VG8 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Auf hellem Hintergrund läuft von links nach rechts ein breiter Investitionspfeil im Nora-Studios-Farbverlauf. Links startet er mit einem Kapital-Symbol wie Münzen oder einem Geldfluss. In der Mitte trifft er auf eine große Kontrollstelle / Schranke mit drei klaren Symbolen: Schild für nationale Sicherheit, Mikrochip für strategische Technologien und Zoll-/Dokumentsymbol für Handels- und Investitionsregeln. Hinter dieser Kontrollstelle teilt sich der ursprüngliche Investitionsstrom in mehrere kleinere Pfeile: einer läuft weiter, einer wird umgeleitet und einer stoppt."
VG9 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Flowchart mit Pfeilen von traditionellen Hubs (z. B. China) zu neuen Standorten (Südostasien, Eastern Europe)"
VG10 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Vier Symbole (Geld, Fabrik, Mensch, Globus) in einer Kreisanordnung"
VG11 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Drei Warnsymbole (Ausrufezeichen in Dreiecken) für Crowding-out, Ungleichheit, Umwelt/Soziales"
VG12 – AI-generated image
https://chat.mistral.ai/
Generated: 22.08.2026
Created with AI image generation,
based on a custom prompt by the author.
based on a custom prompt by the author.
π "Create a clean educational infographic on a bright white background showing the global concentration of foreign direct investment. At the top, display a minimalist world map with selected major FDI recipient countries highlighted using the Nora Studios gradient from purple (#833AB4) through pink (#E1306C) to orange (#FF5F1F), while all other countries remain light gray. Below the map, show a clear visual representation that more than 80% of global FDI inflows go to the top 20 recipient economies, while less than 20% goes to the rest of the world. Use a large >80% donut chart and simple recipient icons. Keep the design modern, minimal, bright and suitable for an educational PowerPoint slide. Avoid unnecessary decorative elements."